Late into March there was a large controversy over news that an anonymous San Diego woman was selling helium hood method suicide kits. For the unaware, the helium hood method of suicide involves wrapping a hood over the user’s head and flooding the hood with helium via a tank connected to the hood through tubing. News of the product generated heated ethical debates over the morality of selling a product for customers to take their lives with. What’s alarming however, isn’t that the product exists, but rather that there is a demand for the product in the first place.
In an interview with CBS the anonymous San Diego woman explained that when she first started her business she only averaged selling two of her kits each month but that by the time of the interview last month her sales had risen to roughly 45 kits each month. What should generate concern isn’t that the woman is selling suicide kits but rather that the demand for her kits has risen with time.
Whether selling weapons, narcotics, or Cinnabons, the market only exists because there is a demand for the product. It’s easy to point a finger at the sale of suicide kits and say that their sale is unethical but to make such a claim ignores the more important issue that the demand for the kits rose. Rather than discuss the ethics of the suicide kit itself what should be discussed is how to eliminate the demand for the product. After all, the suicide kit is a symptom of an existing demand not a cause.
Be it increased funding to suicide and crisis prevention hotlines, discounted therapy for people suffering suicidal thoughts, or another solution, the bottom line is that discussing the ethics of a product made to aid in suicide is an exercise in futility and represents time that could be much better spent looking for ways to decrease the number of people who want to kill themselves in the first place.
Perhaps selling a product with the primary function of assisting the user in taking their own life is callous, it doesn’t matter. What matters is that we stay focused on fixing the real problem rather than attacking its symptoms.
Fix the problem not the symptom
April 13, 2011
Story continues below advertisement
0
Donate to The Mesa Press
$405
$700
Contributed
Our Goal
Your donation will support the student journalists of San Diego Mesa College. Your contribution will allow us to purchase equipment and cover our annual website hosting costs.
About the Contributor
Andrew Fergin, Editor in Chief
Co-Editor in chief for The Mesa Press (alongside Gisela Lagos), Andrew Fergin is working on a degree in journalism. Having enjoyed writing for most of his life, The Mesa Press gives Andrew an outlet for his creative energy. Though he favors writing reviews and opinion articles because they give him the most freedom to be witty, Andrew has written a broad range of articles including news reports, sports articles, and staff editorials.